This comment bothers me because, well, he doesn't. This is akin to saying that he has the right not to be rained upon. No, that's not quite right. A more accurate analogy would be to say that he has the right not to get hit in the head with a golf ball. In order to enforce that right at all times, such as when said mayor was taking a stroll on an amazingly well-tended patch of grass, one would have to prevent anyone from ever hitting a golf ball, an activity that's otherwise perfectly legal. Similarly, in order to prevent said mayor from ever getting hit by a bullet, no matter where he may be, one would need to prevent anyone from ever firing a gun.
Of course, as with any analogy, this one breaks down at some point. While golfing is an enjoyable leisure-time activity for some, it's certainly not an activity that could ever be considered crucial to life and limb. There are cases, on the other hand, in which firing a gun might be so. So in order to enforce said mayor's right not to be shot, one would need to condemn others to be victims of violent crimes.
No comments:
Post a Comment